Tuesday, October 29, 2013

Every Woody Allen Film Ranked in Merit Order




Upper Elite Tier


Stardust Memories
Manhattan
Crimes and Misdemeanours
Annie Hall
Sleeper









Elite Tier



Broadway Danny Rose
Sweet and Lowdown
Bananas
Hannah and Her Sisters










Upper Quality Tier


Bullets Over Broadway
Manhattan Murder Mystery
Deconstructing Harry
Purple Rose of Cairo
Love and Death









Quality Tier


Interiors
Midnight in Paris
Husbands and Wives










Upper Solid Tier


Blue Jasmine
Radio Days
Zelig
September








'Check mate you little potza!'

Solid Tier

Whatever Works
Match Point
Another Woman
Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Sex (But Were Afraid to Ask)
Take the Money and Run
Vicky Christina Barcelona
Everyone Says I Love You









Upper Marginal Tier


Small Time Crooks
Hollywood Ending
Mighty Aphrodite
Shadows and Fog
Scoop
What's Up Tiger Lily








Marginal Tier


To Rome With Love
Melinda and Melinda
You Will Meet a Tall Dark Stranger








The Pits Tier


Curse of the Jade Scorpion
Alice
Celebrity








Run For The Exits Tier


Cassandra's Dream
Anything Else



Wednesday, August 28, 2013

Second Movie Syndrome: Five Follow Up Features That Died


To start with, I loved District 9. It was one of the best films of its year and one of the most original sci fi movies for some time. Its young South African director, Neill Blomkamp, established himself as one of the world’s most exciting film makers with one audacious stroke. Expectations for his follow up were high...

But I hated Elysium. Blomkamp’s long delayed second movie was muddled, illogical and bloated. And oddly plodding, considering how busy it was. I took a lot of residual goodwill into Elysium, but left very disappointed.

And so Elysium provided a fine example of 'Second Movie Syndrome,' where a lauded debut feature is followed by a turkey. Today’s list highlights 5 of these difficult follow ups:




5. John Singleton




1st Film – Boyz ‘n  the Hood

Follow Up – Poetic Justice

From this distant point in the future, it’s hard to remember the impact that director John Singleton’s first movie, Boyz ‘n the Hood, had. But this frank, bleak drama of young African American men struggling to cope with the violence inherent in their environment was one of the most talked about releases of its time. Roger Ebert called it ‘One of the best American films for many years’ and Empire magazine raved that it was ‘masterfully crafted and nothing short of amazing.’ This was the sort of movie that became part of the atmosphere; people discussed it earnestly over water coolers, and sketch comedy shows did ridiculous parodies of it in prime time. With one film, Singleton (who was only 26 when he wrote and directed Boyz) seemed to have established himself as a fresh new voice in African American cinema, like a West Coast version of Spike Lee.

Two years after Boyz he returned with Poetic Justice, a limp romantic drama largely notable for the novelty casting of Janet Jackson in the lead. 




Jackson plays Justice, a shut in single mother who also happens to be a poetry genius (the poems are supplied by Maya Angelou, so are either brilliant or a bit fruity, depending on your taste). She’s wooed by Tupac Shakur, who plays a tough postie with a heart of gold. Both have tragedies in their past, which are revealed to anyone who can survive more than an hour of this movie’s leaden pacing, and everyone learns a thing or two by the end. The contrast between the uncompromising approach of Boyz and the cliched scenarios of Justice could hardly be more pronounced.










4. Kevin Smith




1st Film – Clerks

Follow Up – Mallrats

In 1994 a schlub from Jersey maxed out a dozen credit cards and sold his comic book collection so he could make a feature film. The result was Clerks, an ultra low budget, crass, uninhibited comedy about a couple of dudes wasting their lives working McJobs in the service industry. The unexpected critical and commercial success of Clerks gifted Kevin Smith a directing career and, perhaps even more improbably, made a minor star out of Jason Mewes. This was one of the first movies I can remember seeing at an ‘art house’ cinema (the wonderful La Luna, in Leederville, Western Australia) and it was an instant favourite of mine, and everyone else I knew. People quoted this movie to each other at parties and you saw the poster on the walls of share houses. It was our lives on screen and it looked like any one of us could have made it. 

Seemingly only a minute later (actually the following year), Smith was back with Mallrats, a film with a similar conceit to Clerks but sporting a much bigger budget.




But where Clerks was witty and sharply observed, Rats was dumb and obvious. And where the satirical elements of the earlier film had balanced the dick and fart jokes, there were now… more dick and fart jokes, cranked to 11. The Clerks were likable if aimless slackers but the Rats were kids you’d probably want to run over if you thought you could get away with it. Despite a few laughs and some (Smith trademark) funny dialogue, Mallrats was as unlikable a follow up as you could imagine. A big comedown, in every respect.











3. Richard Kelly




1st Film – Donnie Darko

Follow Up – Southland Tales

Unlike the other first films on this list, Donnie Darko did not have an immediate impact. In fact, director Richard Kelly has stated that his metaphysical time travel funhouse was close to going straight to DVD, so puzzled were prospective distributors by what he’d produced. But Newmarket Films gave it a limited release in 2001 (after Drew Barrymore’s Flower Films had helped fund the production) and the films reputation began to grow; slowly, incrementally, by word of mouth. When this lead to a wider theatrical run, Darko caught fire in a way that has left an enduring imprint much larger than the modest film that spurred it. There were positive reviews, sure, but there are also Darko fansites, fan fiction, chatrooms, t-shirts, conventions, social network pages, clubs, acolytes and obsessives and a reproduction of the phony book (The Philosophy of Time Travel) that drives part of the plot available on Amazon. To say nothing of the graphic novels that the director himself helped produce, to flesh out the story's ideas. 26 year old Kelly was hailed as a visionary (Variety called him ‘a natural born film maker’) and when it was over he had not only created a cult phenomenon but his own private army of dedicated fans.

Following all this up was obviously going to be a tough task. In 2005, Kelly wrote and directed Southland Tales; a post-apocalyptic, serio-comic satire with a multi-narrative structure and a three hour running time. 




A big, challenging, ambitious film. The post production was lengthy and Kelly, unwisely, submitted a rough cut of Tales to the Cannes film festival in 2006. The critical response was ferocious; The Observer called Tales ‘one of the worst films ever presented in competition at Cannes,’ and Salon.com’s critic dubbed it ‘the biggest, ugliest mess I’ve ever seen.’ On the back of this, the American release was delayed while the film was re-edited and new special effects added. Southland Tales eventually received a limited release late in 2007, having sat in post for more than two years, but there was no word of mouth to resuscitate the film this time. The critics remained almost universally hostile, and Tales recovered only a few hundred thousand of its $17 million dollar price tag.












2.  George A. Romero




1st Film – Night of the Living Dead

Follow Up – There’s Always Vanilla

In the zombie saturated era in which we live, it’s easy to overlook the fact that the living dead as we know them aren’t even 50 years old. In 1968, TV cameraman George Romero and his friends cobbled together enough money to make a feature length horror film, which introduced the world to the stumbling, flesh eating creatures we now know so well. Shot in classic DIY, underground film fashion (real locations, amateur actors, black and white) and utilising untold gallons of Bosco as fake blood, Romero’s seminal horror classic achieved a level of tense realism often missing from mainstream horror films. Audiences around the world were riveted and disgusted in equal measure, but the notoriety that soon sprang up around the film undoubtedly furthered its popularity, leading to a string of sequels, remakes and rip-offs. Romero had not just made a stunning first movie, but had invented an entire genre.

Many of NOTLD’s sequels would be directed by Romero himself and he quickly became identified as strictly a horror director. Less well known is that his follow up to his zombie classic was a film of an entirely different sort, a melodrama about a troubled love affair called There’s Always Vanilla. 



Chris is an aimless young man who hasn’t found any direction since he was discharged from the Army. Lynn is an older, but equally restless, woman who Chris meets by chance at a train station. They have an affair, Lynn falls pregnant and Chris ponders the meaning of things while his father tries to bully him into working in the family business. A film further removed from zombies attacking an isolated farmhouse is hard to imagine. Which was a deliberate move on the part of the film maker; Romero chose the project specifically to move away from horror in the hope of expanding his range. But ultimately he was disappointed with the result. In interviews he has described Vanilla as ‘his worst film’ and ‘a total mess.’ Barely released in 1971 and largely unseen for decades, the film has found some sort of an audience among Romero completists, and a copy of the movie is included as a bonus on a couple of his DVD packages.










1. Dennis Hopper




1st Film – Easy Rider

Follow Up – The Last Movie

Everyone involved was wary of putting Dennis Hopper in charge of Easy Rider. The bit part actor and wannabe film maker was notorious in Hollywood for his hard living and violent temper. Many of his contemporaries thought he was nuts. But, in a different way, giving Hopper control of this movie made perfect sense; who better to helm the ultimate counter-culture statement then someone whose very way of life was an affront to the establishment. The shoot was predictably chaotic; plentiful drug and alcohol consumption fueled a spontaneous style, minimal planning and a lot of improv, along with many fights, both verbal and physical. What emerged from this madness was, astonishingly, a bona fide classic; a funny, entertaining, even melancholy take on contemporary America. But words are almost inadequate to describe the effect this movie had on the film industry in the US; when it simply exploded at the box office (taking a then staggering $19 million in 1969 alone) the entire structure of Hollywood was turned on its head. The old way of making films was never going to produce something like Easy Rider so the old way was re-jigged. Long observed traditions were gone, overnight. Old rules were torn up. The era of the auteur and The New Hollywood had arrived.

It was inevitable that the unlikely instigator of all this would let his sudden status go to his head; after a decade of bit parts in negligible films, Hopper found himself lauded as an artist and a pioneer. 



He could have done anything for his follow up project, but decided to return to a complex idea he had hatched earlier in the 1960’s, and even pitched to the studios unsuccessfully, before Easy Rider hit big. With a working title of Chinchero, Hopper’s new film featured himself as a movie stuntman, attached to a shoot in South America that has a bizarre effect on the native population. Hopper took a million dollars of Universal's money (Easy Rider had cost about a third of this) and decamped to Peru with a wide circle of friends and acquaintances for an extended location shoot/party. After filming for nearly 12 months, Hopper then returned to his ranch in Mexico with thousands of feet of footage and began an obsessive editing process while in the grip of an alcohol and drug frenzy. It would be another 18 months before anyone saw the finished film, now prophetically titled The Last Movie. Then Universal Studios head Ned Tanen recalls his first viewing, 'We called it a catastrophe  Not a disaster, a catastrophe. This was a full blown earthquake on level nine. There was nowhere to run.' Hopper had produced not an Easy Rider sequel, but a difficult, abstract, non linear treatise on the nature of reality. Movie took the top prize at the Venice film festival but sunk without a trace in the States, ignored by audiences and patronised by critics. It lost so much money that it would be ten years before Hopper could get another directing gig, and 17 years before he was trusted to direct another script of his own. 


Saturday, July 27, 2013

A Punter's Guide to MIFF





Or... what I saw at the Melbourne International Film Festival, 2013.




I'M SO EXCITED!




Rates:  *  *

The 62nd MIFF opened with the latest from acclaimed Spanish director Pedro Aldomovar, which marked a return to the raunchy, uninhibited comedies that put him on the map. It's a shame then that this film mostly fails to titillate or shock, and so compares unfavourably with the director's earlier work. There are some laughs to be had - as the crew of a stricken airliner try to distract each other from their plight with drunken craziness - but the film misfires too often for these antics to ever rise above the mediocre. One of the world's finest directors spinning his wheels.










LEVIATHAN




Rates:  *  * 

A large fishing trawler ploughs the North Atlantic; the crew unspool nets, haul them back in and then dismember their catch in the most brutal way imaginable, leaving a trail of blood and fish bits in the boat's wake. This German documentary takes a cinema verite approach to working life at sea, focusing on the purely aural and visual elements of men at large in a vast, wild domain. But despite some eye popping moments, this hypnotic film largely fails to enthrall, as too much screen time is given over to... not very much. A real time sequence of a crew member falling asleep watching TV says plenty about the reaction the film is likely to engender.











DRINKING BUDDIES




Rates:  *  *  *  *

Kate (Olivia Wilde) is like the poster child for a savvy generation; she has a cool job - marketing for a micro brewery - hip clothes, an upbeat attitude and a sharp line in witty comebacks with her equally up to date co-workers. The only dull spot in her busy life is her plodding boyfriend Chris (Ron Livingstone), who's so earnest he seems to move in slow motion, and to who she is obviously not well suited. Flirtation and distraction come in the form of one of her colleagues, the energetic Luke (Jake Johnson), whose eye wanders from his own girlfriend when Kate and Chris split up. Director Joe Swanberg starts with some obvious romantic comedy tropes, but then deftly diverts them in unexpected ways, en route to a refreshingly mature conclusion. The director has a wonderful grasp of his characters and their lives, and is greatly aided by a series of charismatic performances from his cast. An absolute winner.










STOKER



Rates:  *  *  * 

Following the death of her father, sullen teenager India (Mia Wasikowska) retreats further into her layered inner world; indifferent to both her tormentors at school and her neurotic mother Eve (Nicole Kidman). Her closeted existence is disturbed by the arrival of her uncle Charlie (Matthew Goode), a handsome and beguiling presence she is both repelled by and attracted to. There's style to burn in this flamboyantly presented but otherwise unsatisfying melodrama, the first English language film from Korean director Chan-wook Park ('Oldboy'). India and Charlie's relationship is intriguing up to a point, and the story features several twists, but the characters are one note, and the thin plot always feels secondary to the film's look. . 










A FIELD IN ENGLAND




Rates:  *  *  *  1/2

Three war deserters in 16th century England become unlikely comrades when they abandon the fighting and set off in search of a pint. They are soon waylaid and forced into the service of O'Neill (Michael Smiley), a well armed Irish occultist searching for a magical treasure he is convinced is buried nearby. British director Ben Wheatley has become something of a MIFF favourite ('Kill List,' 'Sightseers') and his latest is a batty, surreal period piece that is equally funny and inscrutable. The dialogue, acting and cinematography are all first rate, but the ultimate object of the exercise, like the buried item the lads are searching for, remains elusive. 










ON THE BEACH




Rates:  *  *  *  *  1/2

In 1964 a nuclear war has devastated the Northern Hemisphere and destroyed most of civilisation as we know it. Anything not annihilated in the initial flash is subject to creeping death, as radioactive fallout slowly spreads across the globe. Melbourne, the world's most southern major city, is the last known pocket of human existence, and the inhabitants nervously busy themselves as they wait for the inevitable. Stanley Kramer's bleak end of the world story has lost none of it's edge, even after fifty years, and presents a devastating portrait of a series of lives caught in a terrible circumstance. As well as providing a fine showcase for some of the leading Hollywood talent of the day - Anthony Perkins, Ava Gardner and Fred Astaire are particularly fine - and despite a typically inert, plank of wood effort from Gregory Peck, On the Beach works equally well as both a piece of social commentary and a heartbreaking human drama. A bona fide classic.










THE PUNK SINGER




Rates:  *  *  *  *

Kathleen Hanna is a punk. A feminist. An activist. An artist. An energetic person with high ideals and an uncompromising attitude to espousing them. This 'Kickstarter' funded bio pic gives air to many different facets of Hanna's life and features wonderful footage of her shouting spoken word at college alongside clips of her manic performances fronting band Bikini Kill. While the presentation is straight forward, this documentary succeeds because of the quality of the assembled footage, the pulsating soundtrack it's set to and by allowing us to spend extensive time with the subject herself, rather than just a parade of lauded talking heads. You can clearly see why someone would want to make a documentary about Kathleen Hanna, and the audience is richer because someone did. 









OMAR




Rates:  *  *  *  *

Omar is an average young man on the verge of adulthood; he works a menial job, hangs out with his friends, lives with his family and daydreams about marrying his sweetheart, Nadia. But Omar lives in the occupied West Bank, and so this ordinary existence stands in stark contrast to his surroundings; where soldiers and automatic weapons form part of the scenery. The clash between hope and violent reality drives this wrenching drama, as our likable protagonist is faced with a series of impossible choices, balancing survival against his conscience. Filmed on location, the urban wasteland of contemporary Palestine lends an immediacy to this gripping film, depicting the struggle for survival in one of the world's most hostile places.












STORIES WE TELL




Rates:  *  *  *  *  1/2

At a certain point in most people's lives they have questions about themselves; their roots, their history, the lives of their parents. Canadian director - and sometime actor - Sarah Polley's probing of these basic questions provides the foundation of this documentary, but her gentle investigation soon takes a number of turns away from the expected as hidden family secrets are exposed (criminal to be revealed here). Utilising interviews with her extended family and their friends, and minimalistic re-enactments, Polley creates a family portrait remarkable for its depth and candour, and distinguished by the range of emotions on display. Joy, pain, sorrow and love all have their place in this story and it's a testament to the skills of the film maker that the audience can truly feel that they have shared in these moments. An outstanding, heartfelt movie.









A TOUCH OF SIN




Rates:  *  *  *  * 

China is the world's most populous country and its economic miracle child; three decades of modernisation has transformed a rural, isolated backwater into a global powerhouse. But these rapid changes have not come without cost. A Touch of Sin shows life in contemporary China through four loosely linked stories, each depicting a central character struggling to cope with the pressures of their daily lives. Each day is a fist fight; for food, for money, shelter, survival. In such a harsh, unforgiving environment, the violence the characters resort to (taken from real life events) seems entirely understandable and eventually becomes just another element of the background noise of a hyperactive society. A powerful, thought provoking film, full of remarkable performances and indelible imagery. Sure to be one of the year's most talked about movies.









PRINCE AVALANCHE





Rates:  *  *  *

Reserved Alvin (Paul Rudd) and slacker Lance (Emile Hirsch) have been thrown together for the summer, working as a two man crew repairing roads damaged in a bushfire in Texas. They spend their days painting lane markings and hammering reflector poles, and their nights irritating each other over a campfire. After one minute of this, you can guess that by the end of another ninety minutes they'll be firm friends. Director David Gordon Green's lackadaisical odd-couple comedy has a few chuckles and an engagingly offbeat tone, but never strays far enough from it's well worn path to catch fire. The two leads are in top form, but don't have enough to work with. 










THE PAST





Rates:  *  *  *  1/2

Ahmad (Ali Mosaffa) returns to France from abroad to finalise a long overdue divorce from his wife Marie (Berenice Bejo), who is now living with the melancholy Samir (Tahar Rahim) and his young son. Over the course of a few days, memories and melodrama collide as the characters sort through their lives and try and untangle the mess they have made of their emotions. Director Asghar Farhadi created a sensation two years ago with the Oscar winning A Separation and this, his follow up, mines similar territory to mostly successful effect. Although, after a stunning first half the film does become mired in a needlessly didactic examination of certain plot points (who sent those crucial emails!). This narrative works best when the characters are left to explore their feelings, which the actors convey with effortless, subtle brilliance.










THE ACT OF KILLING




Rates:  *  *  *  1/2

A military coup in Indonesia in the 1960's triggered an era of vengeance and oppression as opponents of the new order were branded Communists and sentenced to death. This bloody work was carried out by the country's criminal element; gangsters and petty thieves who were armed, legitimised and given free reign to achieve the new  Government's ends. Joshua Oppenheimer's documentary examines a few of these killers in the present day and finds them unabashed about their bloody past and, astonishingly, lionised by their communities as national heroes of a sort. The surreal atmosphere of the film is taken to an extreme when the men are encouraged to re-enact their crimes and commence making a film of their own, recounting the days when they were 'killing happily.' An undoubtedly striking and unique film, with many moments that are simply jaw dropping, the overall impact is diluted somewhat by the monolithic length and the toll spending this much time with such vile people takes.










BASTARDS




Rates:  *  1/2

After the suicide of a close friend, sea captain Marco (a sturdy Vincent Lindon) quits his job and returns to the city to watch over the remnants of the man's family. He finds the dead man's widow and daughter in dire straights and soon traces the root of their problems to local business tycoon Edouard (Michel Supor), a slimey sexual pervert on whom Marco vows revenge. Director Claire Denis delivers this lurid melodrama in her familiar fragmented style and while this remains as captivating as ever, beneath the dash of the presentation is a ponderous, plodding narrative. The characters are all thoroughly unlikable and their desultory interactions meander slowly toward a disappointingly straight forward conclusion. Fundamentally; people are awful and do terrible things to each other for the most selfish of reasons, a common enough movie theme that you've seen given much more interesting treatment.









UPSTREAM COLOUR




Rates:  *  *  *  *  1/2

The Thief may have conceived the perfect crime; he poisons his victims with a parasitic worm that induces a catatonic state, leaving them vulnerable to outside manipulation. He then politely asks them to hand over all of their money and departs with this in a suitcase, leaving the helpless sucker to deal with the resulting psychological trauma, but no memory of his presence. Independent American director Shane Carruth returns with his second feature, nine years after cult favourite Primer, the sort of film for which a concise summary is almost impossible. After a moderately straight forward first act, still full of more ideas than most feature films can encompass, the movie then embarks on an ambitious, complex examination of relationships, reality and patterns of behaviour. And... pigs. Many, many pigs. A bold, at times outlandish, film that is in equal parts disturbing, funny, tender and tragic, but is never less than fascinating. The director also contributes a neat acting turn as Jeff. 










AIN'T THEM BODIES SAINTS



Rates:  *  *  * 

Bob (Casey Affleck) and Ruth (Rooney Mara) are a low rent, likable outlaw couple in rural Texas. When they are cornered by the law, Bob shoulders the blame for their crimes and goes to jail, leaving Ruth to reinvent herself as a straight laced mother to their young child. Several years pass before Bob breaks out of prison, and joins a long line of escaped movie convicts heading for a home that no longer exists, except in his mind. A well rendered slow burn featuring fine performances from Affleck and Ben Foster (as a well intentioned deputy) and luminous cinematography, Saints mixes some effective moments with an uninspired story to middling effect.








THESE FINAL HOURS




Rates:  *  *  *  *

In the wake of a massive, civilisation ending catastrophe (implied to be a meteor impact in the Northern hemisphere), residents of Perth, Western Australia face up to the end with varying degrees of stoicism. Perennial fuck up James (Nathan Phillips) wants to spend the day partying with his friends, but a chance encounter with a distressed young girl (brilliantly played by Angourie Rice), provides him with one last opportunity to show his previously hidden good qualities. This terrific, low budget Australian film serves as showcase for talent on both sides of the camera, and provides moments of excitement and tension along with less expected elements of pathos. Echoing On the Beach but with a contemporary mentality, Hours provides a particularly fine example of the sort of local film we don't see often enough. Winner of The Age critics award for best local feature.











BIG NAME NO BLANKETS





Rates:  *  *  *  1/2

George Burrarwanga was a rock star; handsome, charismatic, energetic, difficult, temperamental and frequently drunk. George's story is at the heart of this documentary, which charts the successes and failures of his primary musical outlet: Warumpi Band. Formed in 1980 and playing a stomping mix of country and classic rock, Warumpi Band struck a small blow for Indigenous Rights when they became the first band to get an Inidgenous language song onto the charts. Given a straightforward presentation, this film is brought to life by thrilling footage from various Warumpi gigs, and by the intriguing dynamic that existed between George and his fellow band co-founder Neil Murray, men who could scarcely be less alike but who forged an enduring bond with their music.














FRUITVALE STATION




Rates:  *  *  *  *

Oscar Grant is an average young man from the Bay Area of San Francisco; he lives with his girlfriend and their daughter (who he dotes on), frets about money, hangs out with his friends and his extended, tight knit family. But Oscar is also a man with a temper and a past, elements of which trigger a truly shocking tragedy on New Years Eve 2009, when he is shot and killed by transit police. This simple, powerful film - a true story - starts with the crime and then flashes back and so every scene is infused with a sense of impending doom. Some of Oscar's shortcomings as a person may be glossed over, but his final day reveals much about the workings of contemporary American society, and his demise indicates that there is still an enormous of work required towards true racial equality in that country. The parallels for an Australian audience are obvious.









A HIJACKING



Rates:  *  *  *  * 1/2

Heading for home after an extended stretch at sea, the listless crew of a Norwegian cargo ship have their tedious routine shattered when they are hijacked by Somali pirates. Escalating events on the ship are compounded by the drama at corporate headquarters, where a controlling CEO (Soren Malling) takes personal charge of the negotiations and quickly finds himself out of his depth. This taught, tightly directed thriller starts slowly and then ratchets up the tension in the second half, particularly when focusing on the plight of the ship's easy going cook Mikkel (a superb Johan Phillip Asbaek). The film achieves a level of realism that is completely absorbing and gives a gripping depiction of different personality types cracking under pressure. A top shelf, if harrowing, movie experience.









COMPUTER CHESS




Rates:  *  *  *  1/2

A computer chess tournament in the early 80's draws a small but intense crowd of misfits, oddballs and programmers to a regional hotel for a weekend of nerdy competition, with as much going on in the rooms after hours as on the chess boards. American mumblecore favourite Andrew Bujalski's latest low-fi comedy is little more than a series of vignettes; many of them hilarious, a number just inexplicable. The cast go a long way to putting this movie over with a series of engaging performances, although Myles Paige is a particular standout as the antagonistic Michael Papageorge. A treat if you're attuned to it sensibility, a baffling exercise if not.










ALL IS LOST




Rates:  *  *  1/2

A lone sailor in the Southern Indian ocean strikes disaster when his small vessel collides with a stray cargo container, fatally breaching its hull. From this point on, nearly every moment is taken up with his struggle to survive, battling storms, fatigue and a series of indifferent cargo ship captains. Hollywood legend Robert Redford is the whole show in this curious man against nature film - which provided MIFF's closing night - and his now craggy good looks neatly complement the rugged grandeur of the untamed wilderness around him. But despite some good scenes and some radiant backdrops, the movie is only partly successful. The little we know about Redford's character, the man is not even named, is not enough to make us really care about his fate, which lends proceedings an aimlessness, despite all the dangers he has to face. An interesting idea for a movie that doesn't quite work.















BLUE RUIN




Rates:  *  *  *  1/2

Homeless Dwight (Macon Blair) seems to have settled at the bottom of the heap; he sleeps in a junked car, rifles through garbage bags for food and periodically breaks and enters. But there is more to Dwight than first appears, and he is shortly shaken out of his torpor when he is notified of the release of the man convicted of murdering his parents twenty years before. Dwight's thirst for vengeance triggers a tense cycle of tit-for-tat violence with the man's family, that soon spirals wildly out of control. This stylish, intelligent, gripping thriller boasts a terrific first half and a wonderful central performance from the expressive Blair, although the second half is more predictable and so less compelling. Up and coming director Jeremy Saulnier has crafted a tough minded film with many surprises and a welcome streak of jet black comedy and looks a talent to watch out for in the future.











THE EAST




Rates:  *  1/2

Dedicated Sarah (Brit Marling) works as an undercover agent for a large, shadowy private security firm. Her latest assignment is to infiltrate the anarchist group 'The East,' who have been making a name for themselves by targeting a series of high profile corporations. Co-writer Marling and director Zal Batmanglij struck gold in 2011 with The Sound of My Voice - one of my favourite films of its year - but after a good start, this follow up is disappointing in almost every respect. Neither the anarchists nor their surprisingly lame 'jams' (pranks) provide much juice and Sarah's crisis - will she allow her new friends to be arrested? - is handled in the most perfunctory way imaginable. Obvious and heavy handed, this is a considerable waste of time and talent.






And that's where I left MIFF this year, having spent a considerable amount of time in the dark and having consumed about 40 000 Eclipse mints in the process. My favourite movies were Upstream Colour and Stories We Tell, both of which will get a wider release, while the major disappointments were the turgid Bastards and the insipid The East, both of which I wanted to be so much better. And, as always, there were far too many films that I just couldn't get to, most of which will hopefully find their way onto other screens in the months ahead.